Saturday, February 16, 2013

Midterm tips & solution notes (Feb 23)

Midterm tip -1: Please occupy only every other seat starting with the seat closest to the aisle.

Midterm tips 0:  Plan to stay for the entire 1:45 minutes. With more time you can do more. Questions 5-7 are somewhat open-ended and you are invited to "go deep" on those. More thought, more nuance, in your responses is better. Additionally, sitting and concentrating for the whole time will help build your stamina for your 3 hour finals.

Problems1-4 are a total of 40 pts (8, 8, 10, 14)
Problems 5-7 are 20 pts each (expect to spend a lot of time on these).
8 is extra credit (about another 20 pts or so, also time consuming)

PS. In my opinion, adequate sleep, even a late morning nap, is helpful, especially when you will be ask to think and make connections.

Midterm tip #1: Include a graph!  
Whenever you are asked to write a paragraph about something, or to discuss or explain something: include a graph!  (or more than one graph if appropriate.) The graphs should, of course, be relevant and they should be referred to in your discussion. Labels on the axes are usually a good idea. Graphs and the discussion that accompanies them are an excellent way to get full credit and even extra credit. Even when you are not explicitly ask for a graph, please do include relevant graphs.

Midterm tip #2: Ignore extraneous information.
Sometimes you will be given extraneous information, information you do not need. That is to see if you can ferret out what is really important and essential to solve a particular problem. You are advised to trust your knowledge and preparation, and ignore extraneous information when the need arises.

Midterm tip #3: It helps if we all use the same states to start with. (The same notation.) For example, what I have for the 1DHO is:
$\psi_o (x) = (1/a \sqrt{\pi})^{1/2}e^{-x^2/(2a^2)}$

$\psi_1 (x) = (2/a \sqrt{\pi})^{1/2}(x/a)e^{-x^2/(2a^2)}$

$\psi_2 (x) = (2/a \sqrt{\pi})^{1/2}((x/a)^2-1/2)e^{-x^2/(2a^2)}$ 

Does that agree with what everyone else has and has been using? (These are discussed in an ancient video (from a December post, i think; the 2nd video made for this class) along with the corresponding infinite sq well states.)

Also, for the infinite square well centered at x=0, as requested below, i think the states are:
$\psi_o (x) = (2/L)^{1/2}cos (\pi x /L)$

$\psi_1 (x) = (2/L)^{1/2}sin (2 \pi x /L)$

$\psi_2 (x) = (2/L)^{1/2}cos (3 \pi x /L)$ 
================================

Solution notes for the midterm problems:



21 comments:

  1. Since there maybe a calculation based problem on the test, are we allowed to use a calculator?

    ReplyDelete
  2. What was the approach to that in 101a and the 5 series?

    ReplyDelete
  3. we were allowed calculators in 101 and the 5 series if i remember correctly. also, i cant seem to find any notes in my notebook/hw/blog about the 3d harmonic oscillator states and the first three states of the infinite well between x=-l/2 and x=l/2, but you mentioned in the midterm review that we should know them, perhaps you could point me in the write direction to obtaining them? thanks

    ReplyDelete
  4. well it is fine with me if you use calculators.

    I'll post the infinite square well states you asked about above.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have a couple general questions:

    1) We say that omega in our wave fuction is the energy of that state over hbar (En/hbar for some state n). In the cases we are working with, do we actually know what En is? Does it depend on what we are observing (ie IDHO, Hydrogen atom, square well...)?

    2)This is more for clarification: When looking at time dependence, is it the difference of the omegas in the exponential that leads to our time dependence?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Is there an energy formula we use for the states of the hydrogen atom like for the 1DHO and Inf. Sq. Well?

      Delete
  6. I am curious as to why we would be considering the wave function a particle in an infinite square well centered at x=0, since all of our homework has been with an orientation centered at L/2(ie. from x=0 to x=L)? That way, the wave functions of the ground, first and second excited states are all sine functions, rather than alternating between cosine and sine. It's not that I think it is extremely difficult to work with this orientation, but it just seems strange that we would be considering this orientation for the first time on the midterm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually you won't really have any problem on the midterm where you need them. it is just that i had mentioned them a few weeks ago, and someone asked so I put them here to save time.

      Delete
  7. Wouldn't the first excited state of an infinite square well centered around the origin be -Asin(2*pi*x/L)?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wouldn't the first excited state of an infinite square well centered around the origin be Psi_1(x)=-Asin(2*pi*x/L)?

    ReplyDelete
  9. i hav the infinite square well states as all in for form of sqrt(2/L)sin(n(pi)x/L) where n = 1,2,3..., none with cos. is that incorrect?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I completely failed that midterm even though I knew how to do everything. I only got to question 4 but I looked at the rest and they were easy. I don't know what happened. How could anyone finish that in 2 hours?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry to hear that. 1-3 were supposed to be warm-up problems and confidence builders. Maybe 3 was a little to vague about what was expected,and I know it is a bit difficult to calculate numbers.

      Regarding 1 or 2, it is hard for me to understand how those could take more than a 10 or 15 minutes, and I am not criticizing, i am wondering if there is a communication issue. Basically I was thinking that I was asking you to write down something on your equation page, and quickly sketch a few things you are familiar with.

      4 was also just expected to be a sketch. not a detailed calculation. Maybe 15, 20 minutes max?

      Delete
    2. I absolutely tanked the midterm for 101a and still got a C. I also failed one of the upper division courses for my major and still get to try again

      At the same time my father recalls working (either tending nuclear submarines at Mare Island or doing something for NRC) with some guy who was totally unaccredited as a nuclear engineer but had ten times the handle on the theory as did anyone else he dealt with. The story there goes that this fellow simply studied the material until he knew it up and down in spite of having practically zero access to anything except the theory books. I would take that story with a grain of salt though, seeing how it's coming from me as a sort of third-hand anecdote.

      The statement that grades aren't everything is a little trite and has never really made me feel any better, but there is some modicum of truth to it. Most, if not all, of you seem to genuinely care about the subject. Time stresses notwithstanding I wouldn't imagine that a bad grade is going to be enough to kick you folks off of whatever road to understanding physics you are already on.

      Delete
  11. I feel like the test was fair and had very interesting questions.

    Some of the questions had numerous important aspects, all of which could be explored in great detail. However, they had to be suppressed for the sake of time. I really had fun thinking about these questions and answering them, but I think I went in to a little too much detail and that's why I ended up running out of time.

    I can see more clearly now that the purpose of the test was to be able to answer the questions with minimum detail, as to be able to answer them all quickly and efficiently. This is true especially in problem 7, where it only takes a few seconds to calculate the time, but to explain the phenomenon in detail could take around 20 minutes or more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True. Here's the way I think about it: working on it in class you want to move quickly through the first 3 or 4 questions to leave enough time for 5, 6 and 7.

      Then, later, at home, you can work on it in a more detailed and nuanced way, which would be good to learn and explore more.

      PS. very few people, including me, did the correct graph for 4b.

      Delete